USA v. Miguel Lugo
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MIGUEL MARTIN LUGO |
| 22-10812 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael C. Gross for Appellant Miguel Martin Lugo. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10812] (ECF: Michael Gross) [Entered: 03/25/2022 04:52 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Michael C. Gross for Appellant Miguel Martin Lugo. Transcript(s) ordered. [22-10812] (ECF: Michael Gross) [Entered: 03/25/2022 04:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael C. Gross for Miguel Martin Lugo. [22-10812] (ECF: Michael Gross) [Entered: 03/25/2022 04:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lisa Tobin Rubio for USA [22-10812] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 03/24/2022 09:10 AM] |
ORDER: Motion to appear pro hac vice filed by Carlos A. Garcia is GRANTED by clerk. [9627555-2] [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:52 PM]
|
| MOTION to appear pro hac vice filed by Attorney Carlos A. Garcia for Appellant Miguel Martin Lugo. [9627555-1] [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:49 PM] |
| CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Miguel Martin Lugo on 03/16/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. [Entered: 03/21/2022 08:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
