Derek Durant v. Secretary, DOC
| DEREK D. DURANT |
| SECRETARY, DOC |
| 22-10883 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ryan Sydejko for Appellee Secretary, DOC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10883] (ECF: Ryan Sydejko) [Entered: 05/17/2022 10:40 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, DOC. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/13/2022 10:25 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ryan Sydejko for Secretary, Department of Corrections Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, DOC. [22-10883] (ECF: Ryan Sydejko) [Entered: 05/05/2022 09:07 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Derek D. Durant. [Entered: 05/13/2022 11:00 AM] |
| Returned Mail was received for Party Derek D. Durant. Address has been confirmed, and mail has been re-sent. IN RE: March 29, 2022 DKT-2 letter to Appellant [Entered: 04/24/2022 10:30 AM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Derek D. Durant was filed on 04/12/2022. Docket Entry 32. [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:16 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Derek D. Durant was filed on 12/09/2021. Docket Entry 25. [Entered: 03/29/2022 11:31 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Derek D. Durant on 03/21/2022. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 03/29/2022 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Derek Durant v. Secretary, DOC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DEREK D. DURANT | |
| Represented By: | Derek D. Durant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DOC | |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Represented By: | Ryan Sydejko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
