Marilyn Aruca v. Linda Allan, et al
| MARILYN ARUCA |
| LINDA R. ALLAN, individually, and in her official capacity as 6th Circuit Court Judge, MICHAEL MOSKAL, Personal Representative and Co-Trustee of the Shawn G. Washinko Trust, THOMAS TASCHLER, Co-Trustee of the Shawn G. Washinko Trust, CHRISTINA RANKIN, Esq., ROBERT PERSANTE, Esq. and DARREN SCOTTS, Esq. |
| 22-11017 |
| March 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Party Marilyn Aruca. Appellants brief due on 06/08/2022 as to Appellant Marilyn Aruca, with the appendix due seven days from the filing of the brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 05/03/2022 09:20 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11017] (ECF: Marilyn Aruca) [Entered: 04/15/2022 12:43 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Marilyn Aruca on 03/11/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/09/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/15/2022 as to Appellant Marilyn Aruca [Entered: 04/01/2022 04:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
