Wade Roberts v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC
WADE ROBERTS |
WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC |
22-11049 |
March 31, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Wade Roberts v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney William R. Carlisle, Jr. for Appellant Wade Roberts. [Entered: 05/13/2022 12:12 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Civil Appeal Statement Out of Time filed by Appellant Wade Roberts is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9658387-2 ] [Entered: 05/13/2022 12:11 PM] |
Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 05/09/2022 03:15 PM] |
MOTION for leave to file a Civil Appeal Statement form filed by Wade Roberts. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9658387-1] [22-11049] (ECF: William Carlisle) [Entered: 05/02/2022 01:42 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Wade Roberts. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/24/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:41 PM] |
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Filer: Wade Roberts, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 04/14/2022, Proceeding Type and Date: Other Hearings 02/07/2022. [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:22 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Wade Roberts, Court Reporter: Geraldine Glover, Proceeding Type and Date: Other Hearings 02/07/2022. [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:17 PM] |
Attorney William R. Carlisle, Jr. for Appellant Wade Roberts has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time.**CAS received after the due date of April 19, 2022** [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:03 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to William R. Carlisle, Jr. for Wade Roberts. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/28/2022 08:59 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney William R. Carlisle, Jr. for Appellant Wade Roberts. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11049] (ECF: William Carlisle) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:44 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney William R. Carlisle, Jr. for Appellant Wade Roberts. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [22-11049] (ECF: William Carlisle) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:09 PM] |
*FILED OUT OF TIME* Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney William R. Carlisle, Jr. for Appellant Wade Roberts. [22-11049]--[Edited 04/29/2022 by TAT] (ECF: William Carlisle) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:05 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William R. Carlisle, Jr. for Wade Roberts. [22-11049] (ECF: William Carlisle) [Entered: 04/25/2022 09:14 AM] |
Transcript Order form has not been processed. According to our records, William Ralph Carlisle, Jr. for Wade Roberts is not a member of the Eleventh Circuit bar. The Transcript Order form has not been processed allowing fourteen days to complete and submit the required application for admission. [Entered: 04/15/2022 08:12 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Keith Jerrod Barnett for Appellee Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11049] (ECF: Keith Barnett) [Entered: 04/13/2022 02:03 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mark J. Windham for Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. [22-11049] (ECF: Mark Windham) [Entered: 04/13/2022 02:02 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Keith Jerrod Barnett for Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. [22-11049] (ECF: Keith Barnett) [Entered: 04/13/2022 01:54 PM] |
Appellate fee was paid on 03/31/2022 as to Appellant Wade Roberts. [Entered: 04/05/2022 04:08 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Wade Roberts on 03/30/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/19/2022 as to Appellant Wade Roberts. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/03/2022 as to Appellee Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC [Entered: 04/05/2022 04:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.