Kymell Pak v. Warden, et al
| KYMELL PAK |
| WARDEN, JACOB BEASLEY, Deputy Warden Security Officer, Tier II, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JONES, Unit Manager, SERGEANT ZACHARY JEROME BLACK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOBBY LEWIS BROWN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINDSEY, INFIRMARY DOCTOR DR. JANE/JOHN DOE, Georgia Correctional HealthCare (GCHC), GCHC NURSES DOE 1 AND 2 and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS DOES, And other officers whose names are not yest known, but whose identity is know to the Defendants or their agents |
| 22-11080 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Kymell Pak has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/19/2022 05:15 PM]
|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David C. Will for Bobby Lewis Brown and Smith. [22-11080] (ECF: David Will) [Entered: 04/22/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Tanya Jeffords for Kymell Pak. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11080] (ECF: Tanya Jeffords) [Entered: 04/22/2022 12:18 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Tanya D. Jeffords for Kymell Pak. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/22/2022 10:37 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Angela Ellen Cusimano for Appellees Jacob Beasley, Zachary Jerome Black, Jones, Lindsey and Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11080] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 04/21/2022 02:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Angela Ellen Cusimano for Warden, CO Jones, Sgt. Zachary Jerome Black, and CO Lindsey [22-11080] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 04/12/2022 10:02 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kymell Pak on 03/31/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/11/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/21/2022 as to Appellant Kymell Pak. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/05/2022 as to Appellees Bobby Lewis Brown and Warden [Entered: 04/07/2022 03:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
