Kameron Butler v. Charlene Smith
| KAMERON BUTLER |
| CHARLENE SMITH |
| 22-11141 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Kameron Butler v. Charlene Smith
|
|
Kameron Butler v. Charlene Smith
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Frances L. Clay for Appellee Charlene Smith. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11141] (ECF: Frances Clay) [Entered: 05/10/2022 03:12 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 05/09/2022 02:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Frances L. Clay for Charlene Smith. [22-11141] (ECF: Frances Clay) [Entered: 04/28/2022 02:27 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Cary Stephen Wiggins for Appellant Kameron Butler. [22-11141] (ECF: Cary Wiggins) [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:10 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Cary Stephen Wiggins for Kameron Butler. [22-11141] (ECF: Cary Wiggins) [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Cary Stephen Wiggins for Appellant Kameron Butler. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11141] (ECF: Cary Wiggins) [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:09 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kameron Butler on 04/07/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The civil appeal statement due 04/28/2022. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/18/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/28/2022 as to Appellant Kameron Butler. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/12/2022 as to Appellee Charlene Smith [Entered: 04/14/2022 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kameron Butler v. Charlene Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: KAMERON BUTLER | |
| Represented By: | Craig Goodmark |
| Represented By: | Cary Stephen Wiggins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CHARLENE SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Frances L. Clay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
