Kenneth Bell v. USA
| KENNETH LAMAR BELL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-11193 |
| April 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Kenneth Lamar Bell was filed on 05/11/2022. Docket Entry 22. [Entered: 05/11/2022 02:53 PM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Kenneth Lamar Bell. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9658382-1] [Entered: 05/02/2022 01:37 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Kenneth Lamar Bell. [Entered: 05/02/2022 01:38 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Dawn A. Tiffin for USA. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/29/2022 09:10 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Dawn A. Tiffin for USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11193] (ECF: Dawn Tiffin) [Entered: 04/28/2022 09:02 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Dawn A. Tiffin for USA [22-11193] (ECF: Dawn Tiffin) [Entered: 04/28/2022 09:00 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Kenneth Lamar Bell was filed on 02/17/2022. Docket Entry 13. [Entered: 04/15/2022 11:23 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kenneth Lamar Bell on 04/11/2022 USDC motion pending: Motion for COA filed on 04/11/2022. DE# 19. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/15/2022 11:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kenneth Bell v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: KENNETH LAMAR BELL | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Lamar Bell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Dawn A. Tiffin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
