David Williams, et al v. Theodore H. Frank
| DAVID WILLIAMS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CAROLL ANGLADE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, HOWARD CLARK, THOMAS MATTHEWS and MARTIZA ANGELES |
| THEODORE H. FRANK |
| SERVICE |
| RECKITT BENCKISER LLC and RB HEALTH (US) LLC |
| 22-11232 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 David Williams, et al v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, et al
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received 4 paper copies of EBrief, filed by Appellant Theodore H. Frank. [Entered: 06/16/2022 11:17 AM] |
| Appellant's brief filed by Theodore H. Frank. [22-11232] (ECF: Theodore Frank) [Entered: 06/14/2022 02:42 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Patrick M. Wallace for Caroll Anglade and David Williams. [22-11232] (ECF: Patrick Wallace) [Entered: 06/13/2022 05:10 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Charles Sipos for Service. [22-11232] (ECF: Charles Sipos) [Entered: 06/09/2022 02:02 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Lori P. Lustrin for Reckitt Benckiser, LLC and RB Health (US) LLC Attorney Lori P. Lustrin for Not Party Service. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11232] (ECF: Lori Lustrin) [Entered: 05/17/2022 11:00 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Martha Geer for Appellees Martiza Angeles, Caroll Anglade, Howard Clark, Thomas Matthews and David Williams. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11232] (ECF: Martha Geer) [Entered: 05/16/2022 05:42 PM] |
| CORRECTION: Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney John Michael Andren for Appellant Theodore H. Frank. The Appendix is due 7 days from the filing of Appellant's brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). --[Edited 05/16/2022 by MLS] [Entered: 05/16/2022 11:04 AM] |
| Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney John Michael Andren for Appellant Theodore H. Frank. Appellant's brief is due on or before 06/14/2022, as to Appellant Theodore H. Frank. Appendix is due on or before 06/28/2022, as to Appellant Theodore H. Frank. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 05/16/2022 11:01 AM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 05/11/2022 04:59 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney John Michael Andren for Appellant Theodore H. Frank. [22-11232] (ECF: John Andren) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:57 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matthew D. Schultz for Caroll Anglade and David Williams. [22-11232] (ECF: Matthew Schultz) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:54 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney John Michael Andren for Appellant Theodore H. Frank. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11232] (ECF: John Andren) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mark R. Sigmon representing David Williams, Caroll Anglade, Thomas Matthews, Martiza Angeles, and Howard Clark [22-11232] (ECF: Mark Sigmon) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:42 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Martha Geer for Caroll Anglade and David Williams. [22-11232] (ECF: Martha Geer) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Theodore H. Frank for Appellant Theodore H. Frank [22-11232] (ECF: Theodore Frank) [Entered: 05/02/2022 10:41 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lori Lustrin for Reckitt Benckiser LLC and RB Health (US) LLC Lori P. Lustrin for Service. [22-11232] (ECF: Lori Lustrin) [Entered: 05/02/2022 08:58 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Melissa Pallett-Vasquez for Reckitt Benckiser LLC and RB Health (US) LLC Melissa Pallett-Vasquez for Service. [22-11232] (ECF: Melissa Pallett-Vasquez) [Entered: 05/02/2022 08:55 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by John Michael Andren for Theodore H. Frank. [22-11232] (ECF: John Andren) [Entered: 04/25/2022 01:58 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney John Michael Andren for Appellant Theodore H. Frank. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [22-11232] (ECF: John Andren) [Entered: 04/25/2022 02:00 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Theodore H. Frank on 04/15/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/31/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/03/2022 as to Appellant Theodore H. Frank. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/17/2022 as to Appellee David Williams [Entered: 04/19/2022 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
