Alex Knight v. USA
Petitioner / Appellant: ALEX KNIGHT
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-11244
Filed: April 18, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2022 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. [Entered: 05/11/2022 09:04 PM]
May 5, 2022 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Alex Knight. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/05/2022 05:26 PM]
May 2, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Lisa Tobin Rubio for United States Attorney Juan Antonio Gonzalez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11244] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 05/02/2022 12:17 PM]
April 26, 2022 Notice of receipt: Motion for COA as to Appellant Alex Knight. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN no CIP included. [Entered: 04/26/2022 04:47 PM]
April 25, 2022 Notice of receipt: Motion for COA as to Appellant Alex Knight. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN No CIP included. [Entered: 04/27/2022 01:40 PM]
April 20, 2022 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Alex Knight was filed on 03/17/2022. Docket Entry 21. [Entered: 04/20/2022 10:41 AM]
April 20, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lisa Tobin Rubio for USA [22-11244] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 04/20/2022 03:38 PM]
April 18, 2022 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Alex Knight on 04/15/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/20/2022 10:27 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alex Knight v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ALEX KNIGHT
Represented By: Alex Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Lisa Tobin Rubio
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?