Lisa Hsu v. U.S. Attorney General
| LISA CHINGFEI HSU |
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-11289 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Lisa Chingfei Hsu is DENIED. [ # 9651016-2 ] ELB, RJL and ALB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/29/2022 10:59 AM]
|
| BIA Record on Appeal Filed [22-11289] (ECF: DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review) [Entered: 04/27/2022 09:54 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Erik R. Quick for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11289] (ECF: Erik Quick) [Entered: 04/27/2022 10:13 AM] |
| Hsu remains in DHS custody, but there are no current plans for removal prior to Thursday, May 5, 2022 filed by Attorney Erik R. Quick for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. [22-11289] (ECF: Erik Quick) [Entered: 04/27/2022 10:53 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Merrick B. Garland, Respondent Erik R. Quick for U.S. Attorney General. [22-11289] (ECF: Erik Quick) [Entered: 04/25/2022 03:47 PM] |
| RESPONSE to Motion for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Lisa Chingfei Hsu [ # 9651016-2 ] filed by Attorney Erik R. Quick for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. [22-11289] (ECF: Erik Quick) [Entered: 04/25/2022 07:21 AM] |
| Public Communication:. Certified Administrative Record - Agency Record filed. [Entered: 04/22/2022 12:58 PM] |
| MOTION for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Lisa Chingfei Hsu. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9651016-1] [Entered: 04/22/2022 11:58 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Lisa Chingfei Hsu. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9651022-1] [Entered: 04/22/2022 12:01 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner Lisa Chingfei Hsu. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9651024-1] [Entered: 04/22/2022 12:02 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: Respondent's Motion to Transfer the Petition for Review to the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Stay of Removal as to Respondent U.S. Attorney General. [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:50 PM] |
| AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioner Lisa Chingfei Hsu. Fee Status: IFP Pending. [Entered: 04/22/2022 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lisa Hsu v. U.S. Attorney General | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LISA CHINGFEI HSU | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Chingfei Hsu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Erik R. Quick |
| Represented By: | Craig William Kuhn |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Michelle M. Ressler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
