Mauricio Usme, et al v. CMI Leisure Management, Inc., et al
MAURICIO USME, LUKASZ ZUTEREK, CAROLINA VASQUEZ, JAVIER PEREZ, JOHAN ORTIZ, LUZ GAVILAN and MARVIN PAZ |
CMI LEISURE MANAGEMENT, INC., CRUISE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and VIKAND MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC |
22-11324 |
April 22, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 05/11/2022 04:25 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mauricio Usme, et al., Appellants Philip D. Parrish for Mauricio Usme. [22-11324] (ECF: Philip Parrish) [Entered: 05/11/2022 12:05 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Robert D. Peltz for Appellants Luz Gavilan, Johan Ortiz, Marvin Paz, Javier Perez, Mauricio Usme, Carolina Vasquez and Lukasz Zuterek. [22-11324] (ECF: Robert Peltz) [Entered: 05/06/2022 02:38 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Elisha M. Sullivan - CMI Leisure Management, Inc., Cruise Management International, Inc., and Vikand Medical Solutions, LLC [22-11324] (ECF: Elisha Sullivan) [Entered: 05/05/2022 03:35 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Michael John Dono for CMI Leisure Management, Inc., Cruise Management International, Inc., and Vikand Medical Solutions, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11324] (ECF: Michael Dono) [Entered: 05/04/2022 12:28 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael John Dono for CMI Leisure Management, Inc., Cruise Management International, Inc., and Vikand Medical Solutions, LLC [22-11324] (ECF: Michael Dono) [Entered: 05/04/2022 12:22 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert D. Peltz for Luz Gavilan, Johan Ortiz, Marvin Paz, Javier Perez, Mauricio Usme, Carolina Vasquez and Lukasz Zuterek. [22-11324] (ECF: Robert Peltz) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:44 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Robert D. Peltz for Appellants Luz Gavilan, Johan Ortiz, Marvin Paz, Javier Perez, Mauricio Usme, Carolina Vasquez and Lukasz Zuterek. No hearings. [22-11324] (ECF: Robert Peltz) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:47 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Robert D. Peltz for Appellants Luz Gavilan, Johan Ortiz, Marvin Paz, Javier Perez, Mauricio Usme, Carolina Vasquez and Lukasz Zuterek. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11324] (ECF: Robert Peltz) [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:51 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Luz Gavilan, Johan Ortiz, Marvin Paz, Javier Perez, Mauricio Usme, Carolina Vasquez and Lukasz Zuterek on 04/22/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/01/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/10/2022 as to Appellant Mauricio Usme. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/24/2022 as to Appellee CMI Leisure Management, Inc. [Entered: 04/26/2022 03:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.