Leonard Goodman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: LEONARD GOODMAN
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-11534
Filed: May 4, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Leonard Goodman failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/22/2022 04:38 PM]
June 2, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Leonard Goodman. [Entered: 06/03/2022 08:53 AM]
May 24, 2022 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Leonard Goodman. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:37 PM]
May 17, 2022 No action will be taken on Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9671577-2 ]. Motion filed by Appellant Leonard Goodman is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 05/17/2022 11:25 AM]
May 9, 2022 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Leonard Goodman was filed on 04/07/2022. Docket Entry 11. [Entered: 05/09/2022 11:46 AM]
May 4, 2022 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Leonard Goodman on 05/02/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/09/2022 11:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Leonard Goodman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LEONARD GOODMAN
Represented By: Leonard Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?