Vitaly Bogomazov v. Ralph Angulo, et al
| VITALY VLADIMIROVICH BOGOMAZOV |
| RALPH ANGULO and GEORGE WILLIAMS |
| 22-11653 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellants Ralph Angulo and George Williams. The appellant's brief is due on or before 08/08/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 07/05/2022 05:06 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Dawn M. Savino, Filer: Ralph Angulo, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 06/27/2022, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 02/08/2022. [Entered: 07/01/2022 04:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Katherine Blankenship for Vitaly Vladimirovich Bogomazov. [22-11653] (ECF: Katherine Blankenship) [Entered: 06/14/2022 10:49 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Amien G. Kacou for Appellee Vitaly Vladimirovich Bogomazov. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11653] (ECF: Amien Kacou) [Entered: 06/14/2022 07:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Janine Lopez for Appellee Vitaly Bogomazov [22-11653] (ECF: Janine Lopez) [Entered: 06/13/2022 07:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Boaz Tilley for Vitaly Vladimirovich Bogomazov. [22-11653] (ECF: Daniel Tilley) [Entered: 06/09/2022 02:15 PM] |
| Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Dawn M. Savino, 05/27/2022, Ralph Angulo, Pre-Trial Proceedings 02/08/2022. [Entered: 05/27/2022 11:43 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Ralph Angulo, Court Reporter: Dawn M. Savino, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 02/08/2022. [Entered: 05/27/2022 11:41 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Edward Himmelfarb for Appellants Ralph Angulo and George Williams. Transcript(s) ordered. [22-11653] (ECF: Edward Himmelfarb) [Entered: 05/24/2022 11:07 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Edward Himmelfarb for Appellants Ralph Angulo and George Williams. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11653] (ECF: Edward Himmelfarb) [Entered: 05/20/2022 11:20 AM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Edward Himmelfarb for Appellants Ralph Angulo and George Williams. [22-11653] (ECF: Edward Himmelfarb) [Entered: 05/20/2022 11:25 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Amien G. Kacou for Vitaly Vladimirovich Bogomazov. [22-11653] (ECF: Amien Kacou) [Entered: 05/20/2022 03:47 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Edward Himmelfarb for Appellants Ralph Angulo and G0838 Williams [22-11653] (ECF: Edward Himmelfarb) [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:18 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ralph Angulo on 05/12/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/31/2022 as to Appellant Ralph Angulo. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/14/2022 as to Appellee Vitaly Vladimirovich Bogomazov [Entered: 05/17/2022 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
