Richard Triolo v. USA
Plaintiff / Appellee: RICHARD A. TRIOLO
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Case Number: 22-11741
Filed: May 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant USA is GRANTED by clerk [ # 9714217-2 ]. Pursuant to FRAP 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date [Entered: 07/18/2022 03:38 PM]
July 14, 2022 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by USA. Motion is Unopposed. [9714217-1] [22-11741] (ECF: David Rhodes) [Entered: 07/14/2022 10:04 AM]
June 30, 2022 Over the phone extension granted by clerk. Appellant's brief is due on 08/04/2022. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 06/30/2022 04:53 PM]
June 16, 2022 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant USA. The appellant's brief is due on or before 07/05/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 06/16/2022 10:08 AM]
June 14, 2022 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to David Paul Rhodes for USA. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 06/14/2022 01:50 PM]
June 14, 2022 Notice of deficient Transcript Order Form filed by Collette B. Cunningham for David Rhodes USA. The Transcript order form must reflect counsel's name on the Signature block and the Transcript Order form should properly reflect wherther transcripts are required for appeal puroposes. Please check the appropriate box. Counsel must file a corrected Transcript Information form. [Entered: 06/14/2022 01:49 PM]
June 14, 2022 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney David Paul Rhodes for Appellant USA. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [22-11741] (ECF: David Rhodes) [Entered: 06/14/2022 03:42 PM]
June 14, 2022 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 06/14/2022 04:30 PM]
June 13, 2022 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney David Paul Rhodes for Appellant USA. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [22-11741] (ECF: David Rhodes) [Entered: 06/13/2022 11:46 AM]
June 10, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David P. Rhodes for USA [22-11741] (ECF: David Rhodes) [Entered: 06/10/2022 04:43 PM]
June 10, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by David P. Rhodes for USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11741] (ECF: David Rhodes) [Entered: 06/10/2022 04:44 PM]
June 10, 2022 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney David Paul Rhodes for Appellant USA. [22-11741] (ECF: David Rhodes) [Entered: 06/10/2022 04:50 PM]
May 24, 2022 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant USA on 05/23/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/09/2022 as to Appellant United States of America. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/23/2022 as to Appellee Richard A. Triolo [Entered: 05/26/2022 11:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richard Triolo v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: RICHARD A. TRIOLO
Represented By: Philip S. Kinney
Represented By: Benjamin Crosby Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Collette B. Cunningham
Represented By: Kyesha Mapp
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Represented By: David Paul Rhodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?