Clifton Brooks v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant: CLIFTON MCNEIL BROOKS
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 22-11889
Filed: June 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2022 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Clifton McNeil Brooks. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9721114-1] [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:36 PM]
July 18, 2022 Amended Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Clifton McNeil Brooks.--[Edited 07/22/2022 by RAV] [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:11 PM]
July 18, 2022 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Clifton McNeil Brooks. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9721100-1] [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:33 PM]
July 5, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Clifton McNeil Brooks. [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:34 PM]
June 23, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Thomas Howland Duffy for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11889] (ECF: Thomas Duffy) [Entered: 06/23/2022 10:57 AM]
June 23, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Thomas Howland Duffy for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11889] (ECF: Thomas Duffy) [Entered: 06/23/2022 10:56 AM]
June 16, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas Howland Duffy for Secretary [22-11889] (ECF: Thomas Duffy) [Entered: 06/16/2022 04:00 PM]
June 13, 2022 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Clifton McNeil Brooks was filed on 04/28/2022. Docket Entry 15. [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:07 PM]
June 6, 2022 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Clifton McNeil Brooks on 06/02/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Clifton Brooks v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CLIFTON MCNEIL BROOKS
Represented By: Clifton McNeil Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Thomas Howland Duffy
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Represented By: Barbara Catherine Debelius-Enemark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?