Betty Smith, et al v. Marcus & Millichap, Incorporated, et al
| BETTY M. SMITH, JUDITH A. BALLEW and MARK F. LAPP |
| MARCUS & MILLICHAP, INCORPORATED and MICHAEL BOKOR |
| 22-11951 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 08/04/2022 03:52 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Out of Time filed by Appellants Betty M. Smith, Judith A. Ballew and Mark F. Lapp is GRANTED by clerk [ # 9709572-2 ]. [Entered: 07/28/2022 01:36 PM]
|
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney James L. Wilkes, II for Appellants Betty M. Smith, Judith A. Ballew and Mark F. Lapp. [Entered: 07/28/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Kyle W. Robisch for Appellee Michael Bokor. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11951] (ECF: Kyle Robisch) [Entered: 07/13/2022 04:02 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Tracey V. Aurelio, Filer: Betty M. Smith, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 07/13/2022, Proceeding Type and Date: Other Hearings 04/20/2022 [Entered: 07/13/2022 03:48 PM] |
| Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Tracey V. Aurelio, 07/08/2022, Betty M. Smith, Other Hearings 04/20/2022 , Other Hearings 12/07/2021. [Entered: 07/12/2022 01:32 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney James L. Wilkes, II for Appellants Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. Transcript(s) ordered. [22-11951] (ECF: James Wilkes) [Entered: 07/08/2022 02:31 PM] |
| The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellants Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 07/08/2022 02:15 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Betty M. Smith, Court Reporter: Tracey V. Aurelio, Proceeding Type and Date: Other Hearings 04/20/2022, Other Hearings 12/07/2021. [Entered: 07/08/2022 04:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mary J. Perry for Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. [22-11951] (ECF: Mary Perry) [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:55 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11951] (ECF: Mary Perry) [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert E. Salyer for Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith [22-11951] (ECF: Robert Salyer) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:04 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to file Civil Appeal Statement out of time filed by Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9709572-1] [22-11951] (ECF: James Wilkes) [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:51 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James L. Wilkes, II for Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. [22-11951] (ECF: James Wilkes) [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:46 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mary J. Perry for Betty M. Smith, Judith A. Ballew and Mark F. Lapp. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 07/01/2022 08:44 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mary J. Perry for Estate of Shirley T. Cox, by and through Betty Smith, Personal Representative, John E. Ballew, by and through Judith A. Ballew, Attorney-in-Fact, and the Estate of Roger J. Lapp, by and through Mark F. Lapp, Personal Representative [22-11951] (ECF: Mary Perry) [Entered: 06/30/2022 12:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James L. Wilkes, II for Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. [22-11951] (ECF: James Wilkes) [Entered: 06/30/2022 05:59 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Mary J. Perry for Estate of Shirley T. Cox, by and through Betty Smith, Personal Representative, John E. Ballew, by and through Judith A. Ballew, Attorney-in-Fact, and the Estate of Roger J. Lapp, by and through Mark F. Lapp, Personal Representative. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11951] (ECF: Mary Perry) [Entered: 06/30/2022 12:49 PM] |
| ***NO ACTION TAKEN; COUNSEL WILL REFILE CORRECTLY*** MOTION for leave to file Appellants' Certificate of Interested Persons and Disclosure Statement; Civil Appeal Statement; Proposed Issues on Appeal; Transcript Information Form; and Attorney Appearances out of time filed by Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9705325-1] [22-11951] --[Edited 07/07/2022 by DSY] (ECF: James Wilkes) [Entered: 06/30/2022 06:21 PM] |
| MOTION Motion to Dismiss Appeal as to Appellee, Marcus & Millichap, Inc. filed by Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith. Motion is Unopposed. [9705326-1] [22-11951] (ECF: James Wilkes) [Entered: 06/30/2022 06:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kyle W. Robisch for Michael Bokor. [22-11951] (ECF: Kyle Robisch) [Entered: 06/29/2022 03:58 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Diana Nicole Evans for Michael Bokor. [22-11951] (ECF: Diana Evans) [Entered: 06/29/2022 04:00 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Zachary A. Madonia for Michael Bokor. [22-11951] (ECF: Zachary Madonia) [Entered: 06/29/2022 04:02 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Allan Joseph for Marcus & Millichap, Incorporated. [22-11951] (ECF: Allan Joseph) [Entered: 06/20/2022 03:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffrey J. Molinaro for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. [22-11951] (ECF: Jeffrey Molinaro) [Entered: 06/20/2022 03:19 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Judith A. Ballew, Mark F. Lapp and Betty M. Smith on 06/08/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/29/2022 as to Appellant Betty M. Smith. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/13/2022 as to Appellees Michael Bokor and Marcus & Millichap, Incorporated [Entered: 06/15/2022 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
