James McConico, Jr. v. Top Golf International Inc., et al
JAMES MCCONICO, JR. |
TOP GOLF INTERNATIONAL INC., DOLF BERLE, ERIK ANDERSON, CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY, OLIVER G. BREWER, III, WEST RIVER GROUP, PROVIDENCE EQUITY PARTNERS, DUNDON CAPITAL PARTNERS, THOMAS DUNDON, JEFFERSON COUNTY CIVIC AUTHORITY, JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSION and JOHNATHAN M. NELSON |
22-11954 |
June 9, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Foreclosure |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
James McConico, Jr. v. Top Golf International Inc., et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellate fee was paid on 07/13/2022 as to Appellant James McConico, Jr.. [Entered: 07/22/2022 10:45 AM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant James McConico, Jr.. The appellant's brief is due on or before 08/22/2022. [Entered: 07/22/2022 12:01 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for extension to pay filing fee filed by Appellant James McConico, Jr. is GRANTED. [ # 9714797-2 ] Filing fee due on 08/19/2022. ELB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 07/20/2022 03:55 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant James McConico, Jr.. [Entered: 07/06/2022 05:45 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file pay the filing fee to 07/26/2022 filed by Appellant James McConico, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9714797-1] [Entered: 07/14/2022 03:15 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant James McConico, Jr. on 06/09/2022. Fee Status: Three Strikes.. [Entered: 06/14/2022 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.