Edward Dane Jeffus v. Jeffrey F. Mahl
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDWARD DANE JEFFUS
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFREY MAHL, Judge, 18th Judicial Circuit Court
Case Number: 22-12040
Filed: June 21, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 28, 2024 Edward Dane Jeffus v. Jeffrey F. Mahl

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2022 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Edward Dane Jeffus on 06/17/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 06/24/2022 08:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Edward Dane Jeffus v. Jeffrey F. Mahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: EDWARD DANE JEFFUS
Represented By: Edward Dane Jeffus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEFFREY MAHL, Judge, 18th Judicial Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?