National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Case Number: 22-12058
Filed: June 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2022 RESPONSE to filed by Petitioner National Labor Relations Board [ # 9700367-2 ] filed by Attorney Ms. Michelle Amy Ochs Windmueller for Respondent United States Postal Service. [22-12058] (ECF: Michelle Windmueller) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:36 AM]
June 28, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ms. Michelle Amy Ochs Windmueller for Respondent United States Postal Service. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12058] (ECF: Michelle Windmueller) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:38 AM]
June 27, 2022 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Ruth E. Burdick for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [22-12058] (ECF: Ruth Burdick) [Entered: 06/27/2022 02:47 PM]
June 27, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ruth E. Burdick for National Labor Relations Board. [22-12058] (ECF: Ruth Burdick) [Entered: 06/27/2022 02:46 PM]
June 24, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michelle Amy Ochs Windmueller for United States Postal Service [22-12058] (ECF: Michelle Windmueller) [Entered: 06/24/2022 02:09 PM]
June 23, 2022 Administrative record filed as to National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 06/24/2022 10:34 AM]
June 23, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 06/24/2022 10:40 AM]
June 23, 2022 APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT DOCKETED. Application for Consent Judgment filed by Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 06/24/2022 10:12 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Represented By: Ruth E. Burdick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Represented By: Michelle Amy Ochs Windmueller
Represented By: Jason L. Hardy
Represented By: Dallas G. Kingsbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SERVICE
Represented By: Stephan James Boardman
Represented By: David Cohen
Represented By: Patricia Delvecchio
Represented By: Joseph Fracek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?