In re: Eugene Marlin
| In re: EUGENE MARLIN |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA |
| 22-12085 |
| June 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Eugene Marlin. Served 06/20/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 06/28/2022 11:42 AM] |
| Notice of receipt of Affidavit In Support Of Request To Proceed In Forma Pauperis: as to Petitioner Eugene Marlin. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Fees are not required for this type of Appeal. [Entered: 06/29/2022 11:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Eugene Marlin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: EUGENE MARLIN | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Marlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
