Harry Wilson v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
HARRY LEE WILSON |
FIFTH THIRD BANK, KATHIE E. SALTERS, MANAGER LAFAYE M. GENWRIGHT and ROBERT A. NEILSON |
22-12186 |
June 29, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Insurance |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Harry Lee Wilson failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/31/2022 11:18 AM] |
This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 08/03/2022 11:57 AM] |
Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Harry Lee Wilson. [Entered: 08/04/2022 12:46 PM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Harry Lee Wilson. [Entered: 07/22/2022 12:26 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Harry Lee Wilson. [Entered: 07/18/2022 10:37 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Harry Lee Wilson on 06/27/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/15/2022 as to Appellant Harry Lee Wilson. [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.