Charles Jordan v. Georgia, et al
| CHARLES JORDAN |
| GEORGIA, 2 UNKNOWN OFFICERS, COP CALLERS, 10 UNKNOWN OFFICERS, CITY OF DALTON and TOWYARD OWNER |
| 22-12270 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. KCN, ELB and RJL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 08/19/2022 11:03 AM]
|
| Notice of receipt: Notice to the Court as to Appellant Charles Jordan. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN appeal is closed. [Entered: 08/22/2022 11:50 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Charles Jordan. [Entered: 08/09/2022 10:38 AM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 07/12/2022. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 08/04/2022 04:24 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Charles Jordan. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of documents without action, or other sanctions. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). [Entered: 07/28/2022 03:58 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles Jordan on 07/12/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 07/13/2022 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
