Ronald Scherer v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
RONALD EARL SCHERER |
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., STEVEN TIGGS, STUART PARCELL and ZEIGER, TIGGES & LITTLE, LLP |
22-12296 |
July 13, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Fraud |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellees Stuart Parcell, Steven Tiggs and Zeiger, Tigges & Little, LLP [22-12296] (ECF: Lissette Gonzalez) [Entered: 08/22/2022 06:37 PM] |
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [22-12296] (ECF: Andrew Boese) [Entered: 08/22/2022 05:54 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Ronald Earl Scherer. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/26/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 08/17/2022 05:01 PM] |
Appellate fee was paid on 08/16/2022 as to Appellant Ronald Earl Scherer. [Entered: 08/17/2022 05:00 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Lissette Gonzalez for Steven Tiggs, Stuart Parcell and Zeiger, Tigges & Little, LLP. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 08/15/2022 09:22 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Lissette Gonzalez for Appellees Stuart Parcell, Steven Tiggs and Zeiger, Tigges & Little, LLP. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12296] (ECF: Lissette Gonzalez) [Entered: 08/12/2022 02:15 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Ronald Earl Scherer. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12296] (ECF: Ronald Scherer) [Entered: 08/11/2022 12:31 PM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Ronald Earl Scherer. [Entered: 08/08/2022 02:58 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12296] (ECF: Andrew Boese) [Entered: 08/05/2022 02:24 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Ronald Earl Scherer. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 08/03/2022 12:11 PM] |
This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 08/03/2022 12:15 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Andrew B. Boese for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. [22-12296] (ECF: Andrew Boese) [Entered: 07/29/2022 12:19 PM] |
**NO ACTION TAKEN-see FRAP 25(a)(2)(B)(iii)**APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek E. Leon for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. [22-12296] (ECF: Andrew Boese) [Entered: 07/29/2022 12:20 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek E. Leon for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. [22-12296] (ECF: Derek Leon) [Entered: 07/29/2022 01:58 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lissette Gonzalez for Steven Tigges, Stuart Parcell, and Zeiger,Tigges & Little, LLP [22-12296] (ECF: Lissette Gonzalez) [Entered: 07/22/2022 05:56 PM] |
USDC order Granting withdrawal of counsel as to Appellant Ronald Earl Scherer was filed on 07/14/2022. Docket Entry 74. [Entered: 07/15/2022 11:24 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ronald Earl Scherer on 07/12/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/29/2022 as to Appellant Ronald Earl Scherer. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/12/2022 as to Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [Entered: 07/15/2022 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.