Joe Nathan James, Jr v. Attorney General, State of Alabama
| JOE NATHAN JAMES |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA |
| 22-12345 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Joe Nathan James, Jr v. Attorney General, State of Alabama |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Mandate issued as to Appellant Joe Nathan James. [Entered: 08/24/2022 12:20 PM]
|
|
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Joe Nathan James in 22-12345, 22-12346. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to stay execution filed by Appellant Joe Nathan James is DENIED. [ # 9721192-2 ] in 22-12345. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [22-12345, 22-12346] [Entered: 07/26/2022 11:40 AM]
|
|
Judgment entered as to Appellant Joe Nathan James in 22-12345, 22-12346. [22-12345, 22-12346] [Entered: 07/26/2022 11:52 AM]
|
|
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Joe Nathan James. [Entered: 07/25/2022 05:18 PM]
|
|
Corrected Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee Attorney General, State of Alabama. [22-12345] (ECF: Richard Anderson) [Entered: 07/25/2022 10:33 AM]
|
|
**DOCKETED IN ERROR**Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee Attorney General, State of Alabama. [22-12345]--[Edited 07/25/2022 by DLT] (ECF: Richard Anderson) [Entered: 07/25/2022 10:16 AM]
|
|
EMERGENCY MOTION to stay execution filed by Appellant Joe Nathan James. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9721192-1] [Entered: 07/22/2022 03:18 PM]
|
|
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Anderson for Attorney General, State of Alabama. [22-12345] (ECF: Richard Anderson) [Entered: 07/19/2022 11:57 AM]
|
|
ORDER: Given the impending execution date and that the appellant is proceeding pro se, the Court will treat the complaints, motions, and other pleadings in Southern District of Alabama case numbers 22-CV-241 and 22-CV-253 as the parties arguments on appeal. The appellant must also file a supplemental letter brief no later than Friday, July 22, 2022. And the state must file a response letter brief no later than Monday, July 25. The letter briefs shall be no more than fifteen pages. There will be no replies unless directed by the Court. ENTERED FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION (See attached order for complete text) [22-12345, 22-12346] [Entered: 07/19/2022 04:45 PM]
|
|
**DEATH PENALTY**PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joe Nathan James on 07/18/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 07/19/2022 11:00 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joe Nathan James, Jr v. Attorney General, State of Alabama | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JOE NATHAN JAMES | |
| Represented By: | Joe Nathan James |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA | |
| Represented By: | Richard Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
