Rodricus Scott v. Jared Akins, et al
RODRICUS D. SCOTT |
JARED AKINS, Statesboro Police Department, individual and official capacities, TYSHEA CHARDAE LEE, Grand Juror, FRANCES JEANETTE MONTERO, Grand Juror, KATHLEEN A. CASH BELL, Grand Juror, CHRISTY L. BROWN, Grand Juror, STEPHEN GIBSON BROWNLEE, Grand Juror, BETH ANN CIESCO, Grand Juror, MELVIN MONROE CLARK, Grand Juror, ASHBY AUGUSTUS DAVIS, Grand Juror, MARC DOUGLASS, Grand Juror, WILLIAM JEFFREY DUKE, Grand Juror, JEFF TODD GREMER, Grand Juror, MICHELE DENISE HICKSON, Grand Juror, ERIN SUZANNE HORST, Grand Juror, DANA MARIE JOHNSON-MILLS, Grand Juror, DEBBIE ANN MATHIAS, Grand Juror, CATHY SMITH NEVILLE, Grand Juror, PHILLIP LAVON PINKNEY, Grand Juror, DAVID POLLETTE, Grand Juror, AMY LAUREN PRESLEY, Grand Juror, DANA DANIELLE RUIZ, Grand Juror, PETER MARK THOMAS, Grand Juror, MATTHEW BRINSON, Statesboro Police Department, JOHN CLARK, Statesboro Police Department, DUSTIN CROSS, Statesboro Police Department, JOEY DELOACH, Statesboro Police Department, JEREMY HANCOCK, Statesboro Police Department, DUSTIN HARDIN, Statesboro Police Department, KEITH HOLLOWAY, Statesboro Police Department, TERRELL LEWIS, Statesboro Police Department, JOSEPH M. MATTHEWS, Statesboro Police Department, JESSE MORRISON, Statesboro Police Department, JACOB PEARCE, Statesboro Police Department, CAMERON REESE, Statesboro Police Department, KATHERINE REESE, Statesboro Police Department, DILLON M. SHEPHERD, Statesboro Police Department, JENNIFER STROSNIDER, Statesboro Police Department, CASEY TOMLINSON, Statesboro Police Department, RAYMOND VARASSE, Statesboro Police Department, JAMES WINSKEY, Statesboro Police Department, NOEL BROWN, Bulloch County Sheriff Office/Bulloch County Jail, KENNETH THOMPSON, Bulloch County Sheriff Office/Bulloch County Jail, LYNN, Bulloch County Sheriff Office/Bulloch County Jail, ANTHONY M. THOMPSON, II, Grand Jury and JENNIFER L. SWEENEY TOOKES, Grand Juror |
22-12499 |
July 26, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Returned Mail was received for Party Rodricus D. Scott. IN RE: Notice of No Action taken on Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Entered: 01/20/2023 03:44 PM] |
Filing 9 Notice of receipt: Letter from appellant regarding receipt of documents as to Appellant Rodricus D. Scott.. This court docket sheet costs $4.00, any documents requested cost .50 cent per page. [Entered: 12/14/2022 01:32 PM] |
Filing 8 No action will be taken on Motion for appointment of counsel [ # 7 ]. The referenced filing from Appellant Rodricus D. Scott . This case is closed. [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:08 PM] |
Filing 7 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Rodricus D. Scott. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7] [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:05 PM] |
Filing 6 Returned Mail was received for Party Rodricus D. Scott. IN RE: 10/6/22 Clerk's Order of Dismissal [Entered: 10/21/2022 11:35 AM] |
Filing 4 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Rodricus D. Scott has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules; and because the appellant Rodricus D. Scott failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/06/2022 08:55 AM] |
Filing 3 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion for relief from the obligation to pay in advance is filed in the District Court. [Entered: 08/22/2022 12:55 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rodricus D. Scott. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 08/17/2022 12:31 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rodricus D. Scott on 08/26/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 08/01/2022 12:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.