Gina Magwood v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.
GINA MAGWOOD |
RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. |
22-12501 |
July 26, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Gina Magwood v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Appellees Joint Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadlines is GRANTED. Appellants brief is due October 11, 2022, with the appendix due seven (7) days from the filing of the brief. Appellees brief is due November 10, 2022, with the appendix, if any, due seven (7) days from the filing of the brief. Appellants reply brief is due November 25, 2022. [ # 9749880-2 ] [ # 9749880-3 ] [ # 9749880-4 ] JP (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 09/02/2022 12:45 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 10/11/2022, for extension of time to file appellee's brief to 11/10/2022, for extension of time to file reply brief to 11/25/2022 filed by Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.. Joint Stipulation of Parties. [9749880-1] [22-12501] (ECF: David Anderson) [Entered: 08/30/2022 12:53 PM] |
Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 08/18/2022 11:28 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney John L. Monroe, Jr. for Appellee Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12501] (ECF: John Monroe) [Entered: 08/11/2022 08:06 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Amelia A. Ragan for Appellant Gina Magwood. No hearings. [Entered: 08/09/2022 07:55 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by John L. Monroe, Jr. for Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.. [22-12501] (ECF: John Monroe) [Entered: 08/09/2022 01:28 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David R. Anderson for Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.. [22-12501] (ECF: David Anderson) [Entered: 08/09/2022 02:03 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Amelia A. Ragan for Appellant Gina Magwood. [22-12501] (ECF: Amelia Ragan) [Entered: 08/09/2022 02:36 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Amelia A. Ragan for Appellant Gina Magwood. No hearings. [22-12501] (ECF: Amelia Ragan) [Entered: 08/04/2022 01:49 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [22-12501] (ECF: Marissa Torgerson) [Entered: 08/03/2022 01:54 PM] |
Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Marissa Torgerson for Gina Magwood. Incorrect Document Attached to Event Pursuant to FRAP 25 (a)(2)(B)(iii) a person cannot electronically file through another person's account. Please resubmit Appearance of Counsel Form for Marissa Torgerson through the appropriate account of the ECF filer reflected on the signature block of the filed document [Entered: 08/03/2022 11:32 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Amelia A. Ragan for Gina Magwood. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 08/03/2022 01:44 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [22-12501] (ECF: Steven Wolfe) [Entered: 08/03/2022 01:51 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Amelia A. Ragan for Gina Magwood. [22-12501] (ECF: Amelia Ragan) [Entered: 08/02/2022 02:25 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Amelia A. Ragan for Appellant Gina Magwood. No hearings. [Entered: 08/02/2022 10:32 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Steven Eric Wolfe for Gina Magwood. [22-12501] (ECF: Amelia Ragan) [Entered: 08/02/2022 02:28 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Amelia A. Ragan for Appellant Gina Magwood. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12501] (ECF: Amelia Ragan) [Entered: 08/02/2022 02:30 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Marissa Torgerson for Gina Magwood. [22-12501] (ECF: Amelia Ragan) [Entered: 08/02/2022 02:29 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Gina Magwood on 07/26/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/06/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/16/2022 as to Appellant Gina Magwood. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/30/2022 as to Appellee Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. [Entered: 08/02/2022 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.