Alexander Brown v. E Hernandez-Perez, et al
| ALEXANDER LEO BROWN |
| E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, MICHAEL R. COLLINS and LUIS RODRIGUEZ |
| 22-12517 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION MOOT: Motion to dismiss appeal as moot is MOOT [ # 9744204-2 ] due to clerk's order filed 09/23/2022. Motion filed by Appellees Michael R. Collins, E Hernandez-Perez and Luis Rodriguez. [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:18 PM] |
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Alexander Leo Brown failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rulesand because the appellant Alexander Leo Brown failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:13 PM]
|
| MOTION to dismiss appeal as moot filed by Michael R. Collins, E Hernandez-Perez and Luis Rodriguez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9744204-1] [22-12517] (ECF: Marie Borland) [Entered: 08/23/2022 12:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Marie Borland for Appellees [22-12517] (ECF: Marie Borland) [Entered: 08/15/2022 04:04 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Alexander Leo Brown on 07/29/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 08/03/2022 05:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
