Sayyid Khan v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
| SAYYID KHAN |
| SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 22-12519 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Sayyid Khan was filed on 08/25/2022. Docket Entry 31. [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Richard Chambers Valuntas for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12519] (ECF: Richard Valuntas) [Entered: 08/26/2022 10:07 AM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Sayyid Khan. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9745186-1] [22-12519] (ECF: Richard Rosenbaum) [Entered: 08/24/2022 11:15 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Richard L. Rosenbaum for Appellant Sayyid Khan. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12519] (ECF: Richard Rosenbaum) [Entered: 08/19/2022 08:51 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Richard L. Rosenbaum for Sayyid Khan. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 08/18/2022 05:38 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Valuntas Appellee Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. [22-12519] (ECF: Richard Valuntas) [Entered: 08/16/2022 11:53 AM] |
| Appearance of counsel form has not been processed. According to our records, Richard Lawrence Rosenbaum for Sayyid Khan is a member of the Eleventh Circuit bar in inactive status. Your appearance form will not be processed until your bar membership has been renewed. [Entered: 08/10/2022 10:21 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Lawrence Rosenbaum for Sayyid Khan. [22-12519]--[Edited 08/11/2022 by TJS] (ECF: Richard Rosenbaum) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:32 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Richard Lawrence Rosenbaum for Appellant Sayyid Khan. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [22-12519] (ECF: Richard Rosenbaum) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:33 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Sayyid Khan on 07/26/2022 USDC motion pending: MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed on 07/26/2022. DE# 28. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
