David Terrence Stephens v. Amanda Regina Jacobson, et al
| DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS |
| AMANDA REGINA JACOBSON, MICHAEL HOWARD LARAY and ROBERT WATTLES, In individual and official capacities |
| 22-12554 |
| August 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Terrence Stephens failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4; ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Terrence Stephens has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/31/2022 03:53 PM]
|
| Notice of receipt: Letter as to Appellant David Terrence Stephens.. [Entered: 08/29/2022 10:25 AM] |
| Notice of receipt: Letter as to Appellant David Terrence Stephens. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN unknown as to relief sought. [Entered: 08/23/2022 12:19 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Terrence Stephens on 08/03/2022. Fee Status: Three Strikes.. [Entered: 08/05/2022 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Terrence Stephens failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4; ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Terrence Stephens has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/31/2022 03:53 PM]