Curtis Hall v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
| CURTIS HALL |
| SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 22-12699 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Curtis Hall. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:11 PM] |
| This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:17 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Bryan Jordan for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12699] (ECF: Bryan Jordan) [Entered: 09/06/2022 10:05 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bryan Jordan for Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. [22-12699] (ECF: Bryan Jordan) [Entered: 08/31/2022 10:38 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Curtis Hall was filed on 07/08/2022. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 08/18/2022 03:51 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Curtis Hall on 08/11/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/18/2022 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Curtis Hall v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CURTIS HALL | |
| Represented By: | Curtis Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Represented By: | Bryan Jordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
