Michael King v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
| MICHAEL KING |
| SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-12739 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| No action will be taken on The referenced motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis filing by Appellant Michael King is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 09/27/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Michael King. [Entered: 09/19/2022 04:39 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Robin A. Compton for Appellees Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12739] (ECF: Robin Compton) [Entered: 08/31/2022 10:04 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robin A. Compton for Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. [22-12739] (ECF: Robin Compton) [Entered: 08/31/2022 10:04 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael King on 08/08/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 08/22/2022 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
