Reginald Burrell v. Childersburg WR/CWC Warden
| REGINALD BURRELL |
| CHILDERSBURG WR/CWC WARDEN |
| 22-12799 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Change of Address for Party Reginald Burrell. [Entered: 10/17/2022 09:15 AM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Reginald Burrell. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9780555-1] [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:01 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Reginald Burrell. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9780543-1] [Entered: 10/12/2022 03:57 PM] |
| No action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 9770554-2 ]. The referenced filing by Appellant Reginald Burrell is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 09/28/2022 08:04 AM] |
| Notice of Change of Address for Party Reginald Burrell. [Entered: 09/28/2022 07:56 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Reginald Burrell. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9770554-1] [Entered: 09/28/2022 08:04 AM] |
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Reginald Burrell. [Entered: 09/23/2022 03:59 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Carrie Gray Shaw for Childersburg WR/CWC Warden. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 09/19/2022 08:42 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Carrie G. Shaw, Sharon Langham and Steve Watson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-12799] (ECF: Carrie Shaw) [Entered: 09/12/2022 10:19 AM] |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY No action will be taken on Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Carrie G. Shaw for Sharon Langham and Steve Watson. The required Appearance of Counsel form has not been filed. You may submit an Appearance of Counsel form. [Entered: 09/12/2022 02:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Carrie Gray Shaw for Childersburg WR/CWC Warden. [22-12799] (ECF: Carrie Shaw) [Entered: 09/12/2022 03:54 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Reginald Burrell. [Entered: 09/08/2022 09:49 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Reginald Burrell was filed on 07/29/2022. Docket Entry 52. [Entered: 08/25/2022 05:54 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Reginald Burrell on 08/18/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/25/2022 05:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
