Darryl Daniels v. Z. Culpepper, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARRYL C. DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee: Z. CULPEPPER, Florida Department of Corrections Regional Director, JANE DOE and MELVIN, Classification Supervisor
Case Number: 22-12805
Filed: August 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Darryl C. Daniels. [Entered: 10/05/2022 11:34 AM]
September 30, 2022 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 09/27/2022. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 09/30/2022 02:50 PM]
September 19, 2022 MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Darryl C. Daniels. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9764046-1] [Entered: 09/20/2022 09:00 AM]
September 19, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Darryl C. Daniels. [Entered: 09/20/2022 08:56 AM]
September 12, 2022 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Darryl C. Daniels. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 09/12/2022 02:28 PM]
August 23, 2022 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darryl C. Daniels on 08/23/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 08/26/2022 01:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Darryl Daniels v. Z. Culpepper, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DARRYL C. DANIELS
Represented By: Darryl C. Daniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Z. CULPEPPER, Florida Department of Corrections Regional Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JANE DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MELVIN, Classification Supervisor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?