William Pearson v. Citibank, et al
| WILLIAM OCIE PEARSON |
| CITIBANK, Corporation and EXECUTIVE RESPONSE UNIT-CITI |
| 22-12961 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. JP, ELB and RJL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 11/01/2022 03:58 PM]
|
| This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 10/27/2022 01:29 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant William Ocie Pearson was filed on 09/21/2022. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 09/23/2022 11:58 AM] |
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant William Ocie Pearson. [Entered: 09/27/2022 04:35 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant William Ocie Pearson. [Entered: 09/14/2022 12:27 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant William Ocie Pearson on 09/02/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/22/2022 as to Appellant William Ocie Pearson. [Entered: 09/08/2022 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
