Antonio Edwards v. FBOP Prison Officials of USP Coleman 1, et al
| ANTONIO EDWARDS, a.k.a. Tank a.k.a. Tony Edwards |
| FBOP PRISON OFFICIALS OF USP COLEMAN 1, FRUIT, SIS Tech - Individual Capacity, LEMOS, CMC of USP Coleman 1 - Individual Capacity, DOBY, Shu Lieutenant - Individual Capacity and JONES, Captain of USP Coleman 1 - Individual Capacity |
| 22-12994 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Antonio Edwards failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or file a consent form within the time fixed by the rules; and because the appellant Antonio Edwards failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/07/2022 09:07 AM]
|
| No action will be taken on Motion for appointment of counsel [ # 9775586-2 ]. The referenced filing from Appellant Antonio Edwards is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 10/05/2022 09:13 AM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Antonio Edwards. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9775586-1] [Entered: 10/05/2022 09:13 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Antonio Edwards on 09/06/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 09/08/2022 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
