Raimundo Hogan v. USA
| RAIMUNDO ANTONIO HOGAN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-13098 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.; Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 9791218-2 ], Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 9783165-2 ]; Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 9783170-2 ] CRW, AJ and BL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 11/07/2022 04:19 PM]
|
| 2nd MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9791218-1] [Entered: 10/26/2022 03:01 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Holly L. Gershow for USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13098] (ECF: Holly Gershow) [Entered: 10/07/2022 10:26 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Holly L. Gershow for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. [22-13098] (ECF: Holly Gershow) [Entered: 10/07/2022 10:24 AM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9783170-1] [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:07 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan. [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:03 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9783165-1] [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:05 AM] |
| ***DOCKETED IN ERROR***, USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan was filed on 10/19/2020. Docket Entry 30.--[Edited 09/21/2022 by MLD] [Entered: 09/20/2022 10:14 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raimundo Antonio Hogan on 09/09/2022 USDC motion pending: MOTION to apply for Sanctions, Fed.R.Civ.P.(B)(1)(2)(3) pursuant to the courts Inherent Power by Raimundo Antonio Hogan filed on 09/15/2022. DE# 62. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/20/2022 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raimundo Hogan v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RAIMUNDO ANTONIO HOGAN | |
| Represented By: | Raimundo Antonio Hogan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Holly Lynn Gershow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
