Jonathan Solomon v. USA
Petitioner / Appellant: JONATHAN SOLOMON
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-13099
Filed: September 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2022 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jonathan Solomon. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9789953-1] [Entered: 10/25/2022 01:44 PM]
October 24, 2022 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Jonathan Solomon. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9789951-1] [Entered: 10/25/2022 01:42 PM]
October 24, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jonathan Solomon. [Entered: 10/25/2022 01:40 PM]
October 4, 2022 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Jonathan Solomon. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 10/04/2022 03:39 PM]
October 3, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. [22-13099] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 10/03/2022 02:12 PM]
October 3, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Michelle Thresher Taylor for USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13099] (ECF: Michelle Taylor) [Entered: 10/03/2022 02:13 PM]
September 16, 2022 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Jonathan Solomon was filed on 08/15/2022. Docket Entry 7. [Entered: 09/16/2022 04:09 PM]
September 13, 2022 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jonathan Solomon on 09/12/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/16/2022 04:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jonathan Solomon v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JONATHAN SOLOMON
Represented By: Jonathan Solomon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Represented By: Michelle Thresher Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?