Mary Black v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
| MARY DRAKE BLACK |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER |
| 22-13125 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Soc Sec - DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Seth B. Thompson for Appellant Mary Drake Black. Appellants brief due on 11/25/2022, with the appendix due seven days from the filing of the brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:26 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Malia Lawson Holzberger for Appellee Social Security Administration, Commissioner. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13125] (ECF: Malia Holzberger) [Entered: 10/17/2022 04:51 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Megan Gideon - Appellee [22-13125] (ECF: Megan Gideon) [Entered: 09/28/2022 08:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Malia L. Holzberger for Appellee, Commissioner of Social Security Administration [22-13125] (ECF: Malia Holzberger) [Entered: 09/28/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Seth B. Thompson for Appellant Mary Drake Black. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13125] (ECF: Seth Thompson) [Entered: 09/23/2022 05:35 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Seth B. Thompson for Appellant Mary Drake Black. [22-13125] (ECF: Seth Thompson) [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:48 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Seth B. Thompson for Mary Drake Black. [22-13125] (ECF: Seth Thompson) [Entered: 09/20/2022 12:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jill Sausser for Commissioner of Social Security [22-13125] (ECF: Jill Sausser) [Entered: 09/20/2022 11:47 AM] |
| According to our records, Seth Balfour Thompson for Mary Drake Black is not a member of the Eleventh Circuit bar. In order to participate in this appeal please complete and submit the required application for admission. [Entered: 09/19/2022 12:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Billingsley for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama for Social Security Administration, Commissioner. [22-13125] (ECF: Praveen Krishna) [Entered: 09/19/2022 12:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Elizabeth Holt for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama for Social Security Administration, Commissioner. [22-13125] (ECF: Elizabeth Holt) [Entered: 09/19/2022 02:11 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mary Drake Black on 09/12/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/25/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/03/2022 as to Appellant Mary Drake Black. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/17/2022 as to Appellee Social Security Administration, Commissioner [Entered: 09/19/2022 12:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
