Usha Jain, et al v. Donald Myers, et al
| USHA JAIN and MANOHAR JAIN |
| DONALD MYERS, HEATHER HIGBEE, JOHN KEST, KEVIN WEISS, WERT, MYA M. HATCHETTE, RENEE ROCHE, DAVID BARKER, MARY BETH VALLEY, MICHAEL J. FURBUSH and ROETZEL AND ANDRESS PA |
| SERVICE |
| 22-13199 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Manohar Jain and Usha Jain failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:24 PM]
|
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellants Dr. Usha Jain and Manohar Jain Party Usha Jain. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13199] (ECF: Usha Jain) [Entered: 10/25/2022 09:57 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Manohar Jain and Usha Jain. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 10/14/2022 02:23 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Manohar Jain and Usha Jain on 09/27/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/13/2022 as to Appellants Manohar Jain and Usha Jain. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/27/2022 as to Appellees David Barker, Michael J. Furbush, Mya M. Hatchette, Donald Myers, Roetzel and Andress PA, Mary Beth Valley and Wert [Entered: 09/29/2022 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Manohar Jain and Usha Jain failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:24 PM]