Usha Jain, et al v. Donald Myers, et al
| USHA JAIN and MANOHAR JAIN |
| DONALD MYERS, HEATHER HIGBEE, JOHN KEST, KEVIN WEISS, WERT, MYA M. HATCHETTE, RENEE ROCHE, DAVID BARKER, MARY BETH VALLEY, MICHAEL J. FURBUSH and ROETZEL AND ANDRESS PA |
| SERVICE |
| 22-13242 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Usha Jain, et al. v. Donald Myers, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 12/29/2022 filed by Usha Jain. Motion is Opposed. [9809050-1] [22-13242] (ECF: Usha Jain) [Entered: 11/18/2022 06:30 PM] |
| Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellees Heather Higbee, John Kest, Donald Myers, Renee Roche and Kevin Weiss [22-13242] (ECF: Samantha-Josephine Baker) [Entered: 11/02/2022 12:00 AM] |
| Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellee Mr. Wert [22-13242] (ECF: Thomas Wert) [Entered: 11/01/2022 03:43 PM] |
| Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Usha Jain [22-13242] (ECF: Usha Jain) [Entered: 11/01/2022 10:15 PM] |
| The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellants Manohar Jain and Usha Jain. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by by Samantha-Josephine Baker for Heather Higbee, John Kest, Donald Myers, Renee Roche and Kevin Weiss. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13242] (ECF: Samantha-Josephine Baker) [Entered: 10/27/2022 08:27 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file pay the filing fee to 11/25/2022 filed by Usha Jain. Motion is Opposed. [9792532-1] [22-13242] (ECF: Usha Jain) [Entered: 10/27/2022 09:01 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Samantha-Josephine Baker for Heather Higbee, John Kest, Donald Myers, Renee Roche and Kevin Weiss. [22-13242] (ECF: Samantha-Josephine Baker) [Entered: 10/27/2022 08:21 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mya M. Hatchette for Appellee Mya M. Hatchette. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13242] (ECF: Mya Hatchette) [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mya M. Hatchette for Mya M. Hatchette. [22-13242] (ECF: Mya Hatchette) [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:09 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13242] (ECF: Thomas Wert) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas Patrick Wert for Mr. Wert. [22-13242] (ECF: Thomas Wert) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:14 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Usha Jain and Manohar Jain as Appellants for appellate review for granting monetary sanctions to Appellee. Party Usha Jain. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13242] (ECF: Usha Jain) [Entered: 10/25/2022 03:07 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Manohar Jain and Usha Jain. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:16 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Manohar Jain, Usha Jain and Mya M. Hatchette, Heather Higbee, John Kest, Donald Myers, Renee Roche, Mary Beth Valley, Kevin Weiss and Mr. Wert. [Entered: 10/18/2022 03:27 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Manohar Jain and Usha Jain on 09/27/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/18/2022 as to Appellants Manohar Jain and Usha Jain. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/01/2022 as to Appellees David Barker, Michael J. Furbush, Mya M. Hatchette, Donald Myers, Roetzel and Andress PA, Mary Beth Valley and Wert [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
