Willis Maxi v. USA
| WILLIS MAXI |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-13254 |
| September 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Willis Maxi. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9801790-1] [Entered: 11/09/2022 02:52 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Willis Maxi. [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:18 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Willis Maxi. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9790020-1] [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:20 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Willis Maxi. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 10/17/2022 03:46 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Lisa Tobin Rubio for United States Attorney Juan Antonio Gonzalez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13254] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 10/12/2022 11:21 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Willis Maxi was filed on 09/14/2022. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:41 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Willis Maxi was filed on 09/29/2022. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:43 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lisa Tobin Rubio for USA [22-13254] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 09/30/2022 01:19 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Willis Maxi on 09/26/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Willis Maxi v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: WILLIS MAXI | |
| Represented By: | Willis Maxi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Tobin Rubio |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
