Mandriez Ramon Spivey v. Sheriff David Davis, et al
| MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY |
| SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, ANITA REYNOLDS, OFFICER BOOZE, OFFICER MERIDITH, OFFICER PERNELL, DOE, Captain, OFFICER MICHEM, DOE, Officer #1, OFFICER PORTER, DOE, Officer #2, CHIEF DEPUTY MIKE SCARBARY, EMMITT SPIVEY, DOE, Bibb County Admin Officer, BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, OFFICER ROSE, DOROTHY SPIVEY, DOE, Nurse, DOE, Officer who denied plaintiff due process, DOE, Officer #3, SHERIFF, DOE, Tactic Squad Officer, MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT, REA RODGERS, J GUIDRY, DOE, White Solicitor, ANGELA REESE ENDSLEY, KENNETH CHAPMAN, Macon Police, DOES, Three Unknown Police Officers, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and CAPTAIN CAROLYN GLOVER, Macon Police Internal Affairs Oficer |
| 22-13285 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Mandriez Ramon Spivey has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules; ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Mandriez Ramon Spivey failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:08 AM]
|
| JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Mandriez Ramon Spivey. [Entered: 10/19/2022 03:12 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mandriez Ramon Spivey. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:22 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Mandriez Ramon Spivey. [Entered: 10/20/2022 09:37 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mandriez Ramon Spivey on 09/27/2022. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/07/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/17/2022 as to Appellant Mandriez Ramon Spivey [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Mandriez Ramon Spivey has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules; ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Mandriez Ramon Spivey failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:08 AM]