Bryce Dunham-Zemberi v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
| BRYCE DUNHAM-ZEMBERI |
| LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON |
| 22-13316 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Employee Retirement (ERISA) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi. The appellant's brief is due on or before 12/27/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 11/17/2022 02:38 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Date filed: 11/12/2022, DE # 51. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Gilda Pastor-Hernandez, Filer: Bryce Dunham-Zemberi, Proceeding Type and Date: Other Hearings 08/31/2022. [Entered: 11/15/2022 10:05 AM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 11/03/2022 03:58 PM] |
| Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Date filed: 10/26/2022, DE # 50. Transcript Order: Gilda Pastor-Hernandez, 10/12/2022, Bryce Dunham-Zemberi, Other Hearings 08/31/2022. [Entered: 10/27/2022 02:48 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13316] (ECF: Lee Marcus) [Entered: 10/14/2022 04:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lee W. Marcus for Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. [22-13316] (ECF: Lee Marcus) [Entered: 10/14/2022 04:56 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Bryce Dunham-Zemberi, Court Reporter: Gilda Pastor-Hernandez, Proceeding Type and Date: Other Hearings 08/31/2022. [Entered: 10/14/2022 11:52 AM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Gregory Michael Dell for Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi. [22-13316] (ECF: Gregory Dell) [Entered: 10/14/2022 11:08 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Jerel C. Dawson for Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi, Alexander Palamara for Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi Attorney Gregory Michael Dell for Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13316] (ECF: Gregory Dell) [Entered: 10/14/2022 10:58 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Gregory Michael Dell for Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi. Transcript(s) ordered. [22-13316] (ECF: Gregory Dell) [Entered: 10/12/2022 02:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jerel C. Dawson for Bryce Dunham-Zemberi. [22-13316] (ECF: Gregory Dell) [Entered: 10/07/2022 12:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gregory Michael Dell for Bryce Dunham-Zemberi. [22-13316] (ECF: Gregory Dell) [Entered: 10/07/2022 12:16 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi on 09/30/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/18/2022 as to Appellant Bryce Dunham-Zemberi. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/01/2022 as to Appellee Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
