Scott Meide v. Pulse Evolution Corporation, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT MEIDE
Defendant / Appellee: PULSE EVOLUTION CORPORATION, JOHN TEXTOR, GREGORY CENTINEO, JULIE NATALE, DANA TEJEDA, AGNES KING, JOHN KING, EVOLUTION AI CORPORATION, JORDAN FIKSENBAUM, LAURA ANTHONY, FRANK PATTERSON and FACEBANK GROUP INC
Case Number: 22-13404
Filed: October 11, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 13, 2023 Scott Meide v. Pulse Evolution Corporation, et al.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: Appellants Motion To File Out Of Time construed as a motion for extension to and including February 10, 2023, to file his appendix is GRANTED. [ # 29 ]. KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 12/06/2022 09:59 AM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 29 MOTION for leave to file out of time CONSTRUED as a motion for extension of time to file appellant's appendix to 02/01/2023 filed by Scott Meide. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [29] [22-13404]--[Edited 12/05/2022 by CB] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:10 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 28 No action will be taken on Motion for extension to file appendix [ # 26 ]. The referenced filing from Appellant Scott Meide is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 12/01/2022 01:55 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 27 Received 4 paper copies of EBrief, filed by Appellant Scott Meide. [Entered: 12/01/2022 01:47 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 26 MOTION for extension of time to file appendix to 02/01/2023 filed by Scott Meide. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [26] [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:12 AM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 25 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Dana Tejeda. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 12/01/2022 10:02 AM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 24 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Michael Daniel Braunstein for Laura Anthony. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 12/01/2022 09:58 AM]
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER: The motion for extension of time to and including January 30, 2023, in which to file the Appellants appendix is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It appears that, as currently drafted, large portions of the explanation have been borrowed from a third-party sourceperhaps a commercial printers filing guide. The Appellant may re-file the motion for extension detailing his own reasons for seeking an extension. [ # 22 ] KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:53 PM]
November 29, 2022 Filing 22 MOTION for extension of time to file appendix to 01/30/2023 filed by Scott Meide. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [22] [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/29/2022 02:55 PM]
November 25, 2022 Filing 21 Appellant's brief filed by Scott Meide. [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/25/2022 08:38 AM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 20 Notice of deficient Appellant brief filed by Party Scott Meide.Deficiencies: Statement of Oral Argument, Statement of the Issues, Summary of the Argument, Argument. [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:43 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 19 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Party Scott Meide. Appendix due on 12/12/2022 as to Appellant Scott Meide. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:11 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 18 No action will be taken on the motion for extension to file appellant brief because the appellant brief has been timely filed. [ # 15 ]. [Entered: 11/21/2022 12:01 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 17 Appellant's brief filed by Scott Meide. [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/20/2022 05:56 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 16 ***Docketed in Error***Appellant's brief filed by Scott Meide. [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/20/2022 05:54 PM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 01/17/2023 filed by Scott Meide. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [15] [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/16/2022 04:19 PM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 14 No action will be taken on the motions for extension of time to file the appellant brief because they do not comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 11/16/2022 04:03 PM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 01/16/2023 filed by Scott Meide. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [13] [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/16/2022 03:19 PM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION Motion for enlargement of time to file Appealant's Opening Brief filed by Scott Meide. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [12] [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:53 PM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Scott-M:Meide for SCOTT MEIDE v PULSE EVOLUTION CORP. et al Party Scott Meide. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13404] (ECF: Scott Meide) [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:28 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael Lee for Appellees Gregory Centineo, Agnes King, John King and Julie Natale. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13404] (ECF: Michael Lee) [Entered: 11/14/2022 07:15 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 9 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Lee for Gregory Centineo, Agnes King, John King and Julie Natale. [22-13404] (ECF: Michael Lee) [Entered: 11/14/2022 06:59 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael Daniel Braunstein for Appellee Laura Anthony. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13404] (ECF: Michael Braunstein) [Entered: 11/14/2022 06:38 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13404] (ECF: Chance Lyman) [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:00 PM]
November 4, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Scott Meide. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/04/2022 04:12 PM]
October 20, 2022 Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Daniel Braunstein for Laura Anthony. [22-13404] (ECF: Robert Salkowski) [Entered: 10/20/2022 05:54 PM]
October 20, 2022 Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert F. Salkowski for Laura Anthony. [22-13404] (ECF: Robert Salkowski) [Entered: 10/20/2022 05:51 PM]
October 19, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard G. Salazar for Evolution AI Corporation, Jordan Fiksenbaum, Frank Patterson, Pulse Evolution Corporation and John Textor. [22-13404] (ECF: Richard Salazar) [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:42 PM]
October 19, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Chance Lyman for Pulse Evolution Corporation, Evolution AI Corporation, John Textor, Jordan Fiksenbaum and Frank Patterson [22-13404] (ECF: Richard Salazar) [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:45 PM]
October 11, 2022 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Scott Meide on 10/11/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/21/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/31/2022 as to Appellant Scott Meide. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/14/2022 as to Appellees Laura Anthony, Gregory Centineo, Pulse Evolution Corporation and Dana Tejeda [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Scott Meide v. Pulse Evolution Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SCOTT MEIDE
Represented By: Scott Meide
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PULSE EVOLUTION CORPORATION
Represented By: Chance Lyman
Represented By: Richard G. Salazar
Represented By: Michael J. Lufkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN TEXTOR
Represented By: Richard G. Salazar
Represented By: Michael J. Lufkin
Represented By: Chance Lyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREGORY CENTINEO
Represented By: R. Kyle Gavin
Represented By: Michael Devon Lee
Represented By: Michael Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JULIE NATALE
Represented By: R. Kyle Gavin
Represented By: Michael Devon Lee
Represented By: Michael Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DANA TEJEDA
Represented By: Dana Tejeda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AGNES KING
Represented By: R. Kyle Gavin
Represented By: Michael Devon Lee
Represented By: Michael Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN KING
Represented By: R. Kyle Gavin
Represented By: Michael Devon Lee
Represented By: Michael Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EVOLUTION AI CORPORATION
Represented By: Richard G. Salazar
Represented By: Michael J. Lufkin
Represented By: Chance Lyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JORDAN FIKSENBAUM
Represented By: Michael J. Lufkin
Represented By: Chance Lyman
Represented By: Richard G. Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LAURA ANTHONY
Represented By: Michael Daniel Braunstein
Represented By: Robert F. Salkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FRANK PATTERSON
Represented By: Richard G. Salazar
Represented By: Michael J. Lufkin
Represented By: Chance Lyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FACEBANK GROUP INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?