Reed Knight v. Warden, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: REED MAX KNIGHT
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Case Number: 22-13415
Filed: October 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Reed Max Knight. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:46 PM]
November 17, 2022 Filing 9 Appellate fee was paid on 10/17/2022 as to Appellant Reed Max Knight. [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:43 PM]
November 15, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Steven Marshall for Warden and Attorney General of the State of Alabama. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/15/2022 09:54 AM]
November 8, 2022 Filing 7 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR***NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Franklin Ozment for Reed Max Knight. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/08/2022 08:47 AM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James Franklin Ozment for Reed Max Knight. [22-13415] (ECF: James Ozment) [Entered: 11/07/2022 11:05 AM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY No action will be taken on Certificate of Interested Persons filed by James Franklin Ozment for Reed Max Knight. The required Appearance of Counsel form has not been filed. You may submit an Appearance of Counsel form with the court within 3 days of this notice. [Entered: 11/07/2022 10:33 AM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney James Franklin Ozment for Appellant Reed Max Knight. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13415] (ECF: James Ozment) [Entered: 11/07/2022 10:00 AM]
November 4, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Franklin Ozment for Reed Max Knight. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/04/2022 10:40 AM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Reed Max Knight was filed on 10/11/2022. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 10/17/2022 10:37 AM]
October 13, 2022 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Reed Max Knight on 09/29/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/17/2022 10:25 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reed Knight v. Warden, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: REED MAX KNIGHT
Represented By: James Franklin Ozment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?