Chief Warrant Officer 4, et al v. Secretary of the United States Department of Defe, et al
| CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER 4, LANCE CORPORAL 3, MIDSHIPMAN 2/C, GUNNERY SERGEANT, COLONEL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OFFICER, LIEUTENANT COLONEL 1, RESERVE LIEUTENANT COLONEL, CAPTAIN, CAPTAIN 2, CAPTAIN 3, FIRST LIEUTENANT, SECOND LIEUTENANT, CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER 3, LANCE CORPORAL 1 and LANCE CORPORAL 2 |
| SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS |
| 22-13522 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 01/27/2023 filed by Commandant, United States Marine Corps and Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. Motion is Unopposed. [13] [22-13522] (ECF: Sarah Carroll) [Entered: 12/13/2022 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Horatio Gabriel Mihet for Captain, Captain 2, Captain 3, Chief Warrant Officer 3, Chief Warrant Officer 4, Colonel Financial Management Officer, First Lieutenant, Gunnery Sergeant, Lance Corporal 1, Lance Corporal 2, Lance Corporal 3, Lieutenant Colonel 1, Midshipman 2/C, Reserve Lieutenant Colonel and Second Lieutenant. [22-13522] (ECF: Horatio Mihet) [Entered: 11/20/2022 07:45 AM] |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Daniel Joseph Schmid for Appellees Captain, Captain 2, Captain 3, Chief Warrant Officer 3, Chief Warrant Officer 4, Colonel Financial Management Officer, First Lieutenant, Gunnery Sergeant, Lance Corporal 1, Lance Corporal 2, Lance Corporal 3, Lieutenant Colonel 1, Midshipman 2/C, Reserve Lieutenant Colonel and Second Lieutenant. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13522] (ECF: Daniel Schmid) [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel Joseph Schmid for Captain, Captain 2, Captain 3, Chief Warrant Officer 3, Chief Warrant Officer 4, Colonel Financial Management Officer, First Lieutenant, Gunnery Sergeant, Lance Corporal 1, Lance Corporal 2, Lance Corporal 3, Lieutenant Colonel 1, Midshipman 2/C, Reserve Lieutenant Colonel and Second Lieutenant. [22-13522] (ECF: Daniel Schmid) [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 9 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Sarah Carroll for Appellants Secretary of the United States Department of Defense and Commandant, United States Marine Corps. Appellants brief due on 12/28/2022 as to Appellants Commandant, United States Marine Corps and Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. Appendix due on 01/04/2023 as to Appellants Commandant, United States Marine Corps and Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 11/09/2022 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 Briefing Notice issued to Appellants Commandant, United States Marine Corps and Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/28/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 11/09/2022 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Charles W. Scarborough for the U.S. Secretary of Defense [22-13522] (ECF: Charles Scarborough) [Entered: 11/07/2022 06:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Sarah Carroll for Appellants Secretary of the United States Department of Defense and Commandant, United States Marine Corps. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Sarah Carroll for Appellants Commandant, United States Marine Corps and Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [22-13522] (ECF: Sarah Carroll) [Entered: 11/07/2022 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Sarah Carroll for Appellants Commandant, United States Marine Corps and Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. [22-13522] (ECF: Sarah Carroll) [Entered: 11/07/2022 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Sarah Carroll, representing Secretary of the U.S. Department of Defense; Commandant, U.S. Marine Corps [22-13522] (ECF: Sarah Carroll) [Entered: 11/04/2022 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Sarah Carroll for Secretary of the U.S. Department of Defense et al.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13522] (ECF: Sarah Carroll) [Entered: 11/04/2022 04:24 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Commandant, United States Marine Corps and Secretary of the United States Department of Defense on 10/14/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/07/2022 as to Appellant Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/21/2022 as to Appellee Chief Warrant Officer 4. [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.