Rosemary Lemus v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.
| ROSEMARY LEMUS |
| JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. |
| 22-13607 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 12/22/2022 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 10 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Marie A. Borland for Appellant Rosemary Lemus. Appellants brief due on 01/05/2023 as to Appellant Rosemary Lemus. Appendix due on 01/12/2023 as to Appellant Rosemary Lemus. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 12/01/2022 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Dena H. Sokolow for Appellee Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13607] (ECF: Dena Sokolow) [Entered: 11/22/2022 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to stay pending appeal, to REMAND this appeal in full to the District Court filed by Rosemary Lemus. Motion is Unopposed. [8] [22-13607] (ECF: Marie Borland) [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Dena H. Sokolow for Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.. [22-13607] (ECF: Dena Sokolow) [Entered: 11/14/2022 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Marie A. Borland for Appellant Rosemary Lemus. [22-13607] (ECF: Marie Borland) [Entered: 11/11/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Marie A. Borland for Appellant Rosemary Lemus. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13607] (ECF: Marie Borland) [Entered: 11/11/2022 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Marie A. Borland for Appellant Rosemary Lemus. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [22-13607] (ECF: Marie Borland) [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Marie Borland for Appellant Rosemary Lemus [22-13607] (ECF: Marie Borland) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 According to our records, Gregory P. Brown for Rosemary Lemus is not a member of the Eleventh Circuit bar. In order to participate in this appeal, you may complete and submit the required application for admission. [Entered: 10/28/2022 04:21 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rosemary Lemus on 10/27/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 12/06/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/14/2022 as to Appellant Rosemary Lemus. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/25/2022 as to Appellee Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. [Entered: 10/28/2022 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
