Vinitha Robinson v. Phillip Sutton, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: VINITHA R. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: PHILLIP SUTTON and HABERSHAM COUNTY
Case Number: 22-13632
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2022 Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Vinitha R. Robinson. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 12/09/2022 03:54 PM]
December 9, 2022 Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Party Vinitha R. Robinson. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [22-13632] (ECF: Vinitha Robinson) [Entered: 12/09/2022 01:56 PM]
December 5, 2022 Filing 11 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 12/05/2022 09:52 AM]
November 29, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE to to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson [ # 9 ] filed by Attorney Kenneth Paul Robin for Appellees Habersham County and Phillip Sutton. [22-13632] (ECF: Kenneth Robin) [Entered: 11/29/2022 08:39 AM]
November 29, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [22-13632] (ECF: Vinitha Robinson) [Entered: 11/29/2022 05:18 AM]
November 22, 2022 Filing 8 RESPONSE to to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson [ # 6 ] filed by Attorney Kenneth Paul Robin for Appellees Habersham County and Phillip Sutton. [22-13632] (ECF: Kenneth Robin) [Entered: 11/22/2022 11:40 AM]
November 22, 2022 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13632] (ECF: Kenneth Robin) [Entered: 11/22/2022 11:37 AM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [22-13632] (ECF: Vinitha Robinson) [Entered: 11/16/2022 12:32 PM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Vinitha R. Robinson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13632] (ECF: Vinitha Robinson) [Entered: 11/16/2022 11:32 AM]
November 15, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Vinitha R. Robinson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/15/2022 10:41 AM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kenneth Paul Robin for Habersham County and Phillip Sutton. [22-13632] (ECF: Kenneth Robin) [Entered: 11/14/2022 03:56 PM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson was filed on 10/31/2022. Docket Entry 104. [Entered: 11/01/2022 02:26 PM]
October 24, 2022 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson on 10/24/2022. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: Motion/Application to Appeal in forma pauperis, DE# 101. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/14/2022 as to Appellant Vinitha R. Robinson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/28/2022 as to Appellee Phillip Sutton [Entered: 10/31/2022 10:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vinitha Robinson v. Phillip Sutton, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VINITHA R. ROBINSON
Represented By: Vinitha R. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILLIP SUTTON
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Robin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HABERSHAM COUNTY
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Robin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?