James Fountain v. Raymond Peterson, et al
JAMES DEAN FOUNTAIN |
RAYMOND PETERSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of the Clinch County Sheriffs Office and JAMES SMITH |
22-13672 |
October 28, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellants Raymond Peterson and James Smith. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 12/15/2022 10:29 AM] |
Filing 18 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellants Raymond Peterson and James Smith. [22-13672] (ECF: Richard Strickland) [Entered: 12/13/2022 02:16 PM] |
Filing 17 Received 4 paper copies of EBrief, filed by Appellants Raymond Peterson and James Smith. [Entered: 12/08/2022 04:18 PM] |
Filing 16 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 12/07/2022 04:29 PM] |
Filing 15 Appellant's brief filed by Raymond Peterson and James Smith. [22-13672] (ECF: Richard Strickland) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:35 PM] |
Filing 14 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 12/07/2022 12:11 PM] |
Filing 13 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Richard K. Strickland for Appellants Raymond Peterson and James Smith. [22-13672] (ECF: Richard Strickland) [Entered: 11/16/2022 04:50 PM] |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to William J. Atkins for James Dean Fountain. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:19 PM] |
Filing 11 Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Tyrone Nathaniel Haugabrook, II for James Dean Fountain. Pursuant to FRAP 25(a)(2)(B)(iii) a person cannot electronically file through another person's account. Please resubmit thru the appropriate account of the ECF filer reflected on the signature block of the filed document. [Entered: 11/15/2022 01:02 PM] |
Filing 10 Appearance of Counsel Form returned to Attorney Tyrone Nathaniel Haugabrook, II for Appellee James Dean Fountain for failure to file application for admission. [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:45 PM] |
Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Richard K. Strickland for Appellants James Smith and Raymond Peterson. No hearing and No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 11/15/2022 12:34 PM] |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by William J. Atkins - Appellee. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13672] (ECF: William Atkins) [Entered: 11/11/2022 01:42 PM] |
Filing 7 ***NO ACTION TAKEN-see FRAP 25(a)(2)(B)(iii)*** APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Tyrone Nathaniel Haugabrook, II for James Dean Fountain. [22-13672]--[Edited 11/15/2022 by CRL]--[Edited 12/16/2022 by CRL, no renewal fee] (ECF: William Atkins) [Entered: 11/11/2022 10:59 AM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William J. Atkins APPELLEE [22-13672] (ECF: William Atkins) [Entered: 11/11/2022 09:06 AM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Sean Kenneth Scally for Raymond Peterson and James Smith. [22-13672] (ECF: Sean Scally) [Entered: 11/11/2022 08:38 AM] |
Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Richard K. Strickland for Appellants Raymond Peterson and James Smith. No hearings. [22-13672] (ECF: Richard Strickland) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:37 PM] |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Richard K. Strickland for Appellants Raymond Peterson and James Smith. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13672] (ECF: Richard Strickland) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:34 PM] |
Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard K. Strickland for Raymond Peterson and James Smith. [22-13672] (ECF: Richard Strickland) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:33 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Raymond Peterson and James Smith on 10/28/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 12/07/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/16/2022 as to Appellant Raymond Peterson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/30/2022 as to Appellee James Dean Fountain [Entered: 11/02/2022 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.