Michael Harrison v. USA
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-13697
Filed: November 1, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION MOOT: Motion for extension of time to file IFP motion is MOOT [ # 4 ]; Motion for extension to file motion for COA is MOOT [ # 4 ] due to this Court's order filed 12/19/2022. Motions filed by Appellant Michael David Harrison. [Entered: 12/20/2022 11:11 AM]
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. AJ, KCN and RJL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 12/19/2022 12:20 PM]
December 9, 2022 Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Michael David Harrison. [Entered: 12/10/2022 06:47 PM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Michael David Harrison. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 12/10/2022 06:49 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time to file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis to 02/06/2023, for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 02/06/2023 filed by Appellant Michael David Harrison. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 12/05/2022 03:22 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 3 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Michael David Harrison. [Entered: 12/05/2022 03:18 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Michael David Harrison. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:48 PM]
November 1, 2022 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael David Harrison on 10/31/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 11/04/2022 04:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Harrison v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL DAVID HARRISON
Represented By: Michael David Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?